{"id":761,"date":"2019-09-20T21:45:16","date_gmt":"2019-09-20T16:15:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/?p=761"},"modified":"2019-09-20T21:45:21","modified_gmt":"2019-09-20T16:15:21","slug":"in-selling-firm-to-a-piramal-group-rly-minister-goyal-pushes-ethical-boundaries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/?p=761","title":{"rendered":"In Selling Firm to a Piramal Group, Rly.Minister, Goyal Pushes Ethical Boundaries"},"content":{"rendered":"

From Flashnet to Shirdi, Railway Minister Piyush Goyal hides details of key business dealings<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Piramal Group has refuted all allegations and is contemplating taking immediate and appropriate legal measures, including defamatory action<\/strong><\/p>\n

The most interesting ‘Corporate Story’ and a ‘Business Deal’ of Railways Minister Piyush Goyal for the benefit of Railway officers and employees, who is the\u00a0 reader of\u00a0<\/strong>‘Railway Samachar’<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"New Delhi:<\/strong>\u00a0In a hitherto undisclosed business deal that took place<\/strong>\u00a0after he joined the Narendra Modi government as minister, senior BJP leader\u00a0Piyush Goyal<\/strong>\u00a0sold the entire stock of a privately held company he and his wife owned, at nearly 1000 times the face value, to a group firm owned by Ajay Piramal \u2013 a billionaire with substantial interests in the infrastructure sector including power.<\/p>\n

The sale took place in September 2014, after Goyal had been a minister for four months.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The transaction is of questionable propriety because neither Goyal\u2019s ownership of the company \u2013 Flashnet Info Solutions (India)\u00a0 Private Limited \u2013 nor its subsequent sale appears to find reflection in the mandatory statement of assets and liabilities he made with the Prime Minister\u2019s Office in 2014 and 2015 as a minister in the government.<\/p>\n

The sale also invites allegations of conflict of interest and crony capitalism as the Piramal group not only had business interests in power and new and renewable energy but went on to extend its investments in the sectors. At the time of the sale, Goyal was the minister of state with independent charge of power, coal and new and renewable energy.<\/p>\n

His dealings with the Piramal group is the second instance of Goyal\u2019s proximity to corporate India to come to light in recent weeks. In both cases, the minister has been less than transparent about his business relationships.<\/p>\n

Questioned earlier this month about his links to Shirdi Industries \u2013 a company he had been a director of till 2010 and that ended up defaulting on loans worth hundreds of crores of rupees in 2014 \u2013 Goyal, who is now minister for railways and coal, issued a statement saying that he has had \u201cno relationship with [the company] since the last eight years and is not responsible for their issues.\u201d<\/p>\n

What he did not disclose, however, is that he and his wife remained major shareholders of the company even after he resigned as director \u2013 and only divested the approximately 4.2% stake they owned via a holding company in 2013, five years after he said he had ended his relationship with Shirdi.<\/p>\n

Sold in a flash but PMO in the dark<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"Goyal and his wife set up Flashnet in 2000 and together they owned 99.9% of the stock in this unlisted company. The BJP leader acknowledged his \u201cshareholding of a controlling nature\u201d in Flashnet in his statutory listing of pecuniary interests (link fixed) filed with the Rajya Sabha secretariat shortly after becoming a member of the upper house in 2010, according to the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR).<\/p>\n

However, Goyal\u2019s asset declarations filed with the Prime Ministers\u2019 Office in 2014 and 2015 omit any mention of his ownership of Flashnet \u2013 or the fact that he and his wife offloaded their shares to Piramal Estates Private Limited.<\/p>\n

His declaration for 2014, which is dated July 24, 2014, mentions Rs 101,300 as the total value of \u201cunquoted securities (book value)\u201d. Assuming he made an accurate declaration, this figure must have included the book value of the 53.95% of Flashnet\u2019s equity he still owned at the time.<\/p>\n

Photo Caption:<\/strong>\u00a0A snapshot from Flashnet Info\u2019s director report, showing that the shares were transferred on September 29.<\/strong><\/p>\n

His shares were transferred to Piramal Estates on September 29, 2014, according to the director\u2019s report to the company\u2019s shareholders on March 31, 2015, as was the 45.95% share his wife owned.<\/p>\n

Curiously, Piyush Goyal\u2019s declaration of assets with the PMO dated March 31, 2015, by which time he had sold his shares in Flashnet, mentions the exact same sum \u2013 Rs 101,300 \u2013 as the total value of unquoted securities at book value.<\/p>\n

A chartered accountant with whom The Wire shared these details raised the following query: \u201cIf the shares were sold on September 29, 2014, why is there no variation in the holding value of shares in Piyush Goyal\u2019s asset declaration prior to sale and post-sale?\u201d<\/p>\n

Cabinet ministers are required to disclose assets and investments held by them, their spouses and their dependents. This is done to ensure the highest levels of transparency, especially when it comes to any potential conflict of interest.<\/p>\n

The value of the shares sold to Piramal also appears not to be reflected in Goyal\u2019s 2016 Rajya Sabha nomination affidavit.<\/p>\n

Piramal\u2019s interests in the power sector<\/strong><\/p>\n

Media reports indicate that the Piramal group entered the renewable energy business in 2013 and in July 2014 inked a deal with APG Asset Management for investments worth $1 billion in various infrastructure projects, including in the power sector.<\/p>\n

In other words, Goyal sold his company to a corporate house which was already invested in the very sector he looked after as a minister of state with independent charge and which had expressly spoken of its intention of expanding its interests in the field.<\/p>\n

Piramal Estates Private Limited posted losses of approximately Rs 119 crore for FY 2014-15, the year it bought Goyal\u2019s firm.<\/p>\n

Flashnet\u2019s valuation<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"Neither Goyal nor Piramal chose to respond\u00a0<\/strong>to questions from The Wire about the valuation of the transferred shares but a board resolution of Piramal Enterprises on June 12, 2014, authorised the purchase of the entire stock of 50,070 shares in Flashnet held by Piyush Goyal and his wife \u201cfor a consideration not exceeding Rs 10,000 per share,\u201d a maximum premium of Rs 9,990 \u2013 or nearly 1000% \u2013 over the face value of Rs 10 each.<\/p>\n

Photo Caption:<\/strong>\u00a0Piramal Enterprises board resolution authorizing the purchase of Flashnet shares.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Company filings by Piramal Enterprises the next year suggest a value of almost Rs 48 crore was placed on the Goyal family\u2019s shares in Flashnet, which translates to Rs 9,586 per share. In the absence of any response from Goyal, however, it is not possible to confirm the amount actually paid to him.<\/p>\n

At the time of the sale, according to the profit\/loss statement filed with the Registrar of Companies, Flashnet showed a profit after tax of around Rs 34 lakhs.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Photo Caption:<\/strong>\u00a0Extract from Piramal Enterprises financial statement for the financial year ending March 2015.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"Six months after the sale, according to statutory filings pertaining to the financial year ending March 2015, the company declared its net worth to be only Rs 10.9 crore.<\/p>\n

Goyal served as director of Flashnet from November 25, 2004, to May 26, 2014 \u2013 the day he was sworn in as minister for power and renewable energy. Seema Goyal was a director from April 2009 until May 26, 2014. The couple, however, continued to own almost 99% percent of the company even after resigning as directors.<\/p>\n

All Rajya Sabha MPs must file a comprehensive listing of their assets and liabilities\u00a0<\/strong>within 90 days of taking their oath and notify any changes each year as well as provide a list of their pecuniary interests, which includes remunerative directorships and controlling stakes in companies. Goyal did mention his controlling stake in Flashnet in 2011 and the director\u2019s remuneration he drew from the company for the financial year ending 2015, according to data collated by ADR. It is not known what declaration if any, he made for the Flashnet share sale in the form of an update to his assets and liabilities statement as these are not available for public scrutiny on the Rajya Sabha website.<\/p>\n

Photo Caption:<\/strong>\u00a0Extract from Profit\/Loss statement of Flashnet Info Solutions (India) Ltd for the year ending March 31, 2014, just before the company\u2019s sale to Piramal Enterprises.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Photo Caption:\u00a0<\/strong>Extract from form AOC-4 filed by Aasan Info Solutions (India) Private Ltd for the financial year ending March 2015.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ajay Piramal did not respond to a questionnaire<\/strong>\u00a0seeking details of his purchase of Goyal\u2019s company, the pricing, and method of valuation of the shares, and the nature of his relationship with the Goyals. Dimple Kapur, the Piramal group\u2019s corporate communications representative, said the company would revert but did not.<\/p>\n

Questions sent to Goyal\u2019s email addresses and text messages sent to him also went unanswered. The story will be updated as and when Goyal and Piramal respond.<\/p>\n

The Wire<\/em>\u00a0also asked the prime minister\u2019s principal secretary, Nripendra Mishra, whether his office was aware of Goyal\u2019s sale of Flashnet to Piramal \u2013 the proceeds of which appear to find no mention in any of the minister\u2019s declarations of assets and liabilities with the PMO \u2013 but has yet to receive an answer.<\/p>\n

After buying Flashnet, family exits Piramal Estates as directors<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"After being bought by Piramal Estates in September 2014, Flashnet\u2019s name was changed to Aasan Info Solutions Private Limited. In FY 2017, the firm posted Rs 14.78 crores of losses.<\/p>\n

File photo of<\/strong>\u00a0Ajay Piramal.\u00a0<\/strong>Credit: Reuters<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ajay Piramal, his wife Swati, Nandini Piramal and Anand Piramal were directors of Piramal Estates Private Limited at the time the sale of Flashnet was effected. For some reason, the four Piramals stepped down from the board in October 2014, just days after the transaction with Goyal\u2019s firm was completed.<\/p>\n

Goyal\u2019s stake in Shirdi Industries<\/strong><\/p>\n

Piyush Goyal also owned a stake in Shirdi Industries<\/strong>\u00a0till 2013, a firm that defaulted the next year on Rs 650 crore worth of loans, mostly taken from public sector banks. Shirdi was eventually given a 60% haircut \u2013 banking parlance for a partial write off \u2013 by the National Company Law Tribunal. In a first of its kind exception to official rules barring defaulting promoters from bidding for and regaining control of their companies once their debts have been restructured, Shirdi\u2019s promoters were allowed to resume control of the company.<\/p>\n

Until 2013, Goyal\u2019s shares in Shirdi were held through another of his firms, Sajal Finance and Investments. Goyal had been the chairman of Shirdi Industries as well as its non-executive director from 2008 to 2010. Shirdi had started experiencing payment difficulties during this period and formally defaulted in 2014.<\/p>\n

The Wire<\/em>\u00a0has reported earlier on Goyal\u2019s relationship with Shirdi and its promoters. A statement issued on Goyal\u2019s behalf by the Bharatiya Janata Party subsequently asserted:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is important to note that the issues after 2010 in Shirdi Industries, have got nothing to do with Mr. Goyal as he has no role in the company after 1st July 2010, and any distress the company had related to 2013 when Congress was in power. In any case, Mr. Goyal has had no relationship with Shirdi Industries since the last 8 years and is not responsible for their issues. None of the ministries handled by Mr. Goyal dealt with this company.\u201d (emphasis added)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

However, regulatory filings reveal that till the end of 2013, Goyal\u2019s Sajal Finance owned 7,25,000 shares of Shirdi Industries, i.e. 4.18% of the total 1,73,07,000 shares issued.<\/p>\n

Besides Shirdi, Goyal also held shares of another defaulter firm of the Shirdi group, Asis Logistics through Sajal Finance.<\/p>\n

In February 2009, Seema and Piyush Goyal became directors of Sajal Finance and in September 2009 became owners of the firm too. Sajal Finance was subsequently taken over by a group company of Shirdi \u2013 Labh Capital Services \u2013 in 2013.<\/p>\n

Piyush Goyal\u2019s wife is also the beneficiary of an unsecured loan from Asis Industries \u2013 owned by the defaulting promoters of Shirdi \u2013 that currently amounts to Rs 1.59 crore.<\/p>\n

Note: In the opening paragraph, the shares were incorrectly described as having been sold \u201cat a premium of 1000%\u201d instead of at 1000 times the book value. In percentage terms, the premium was nearly 100,000%.<\/p>\n

Piramal Group Responds to The Wire’s Story on Piyush Goyal<\/strong><\/p>\n

‘The purchase consideration paid was the fair value of the underlying investments … [We have] a long track record of acquiring businesses that complement, scale up or grow our existing business offerings and also constantly evaluate any new opportunities to grow in new space.’<\/p>\n

The Piramal Group has issued a statement in response to The Wire\u2018s story on the 2014 sale of Flashnet Info Solutions (India) Private Limited \u2013 a company owned by Piyush Goyal, who was minister for power and renewable energy at the time \u2013 to a Piramal family entity.<\/p>\n

The statement was emailed to The Wire at 22.45 on Saturday, April 28, four days after the reporter who filed the story, Rohini Singh, first contacted the company with a questionnaire.<\/p>\n

The Piramal Group\u2019s statement, which\u00a0The Wire\u00a0<\/em>covered the same night, is reproduced below in full, along with responses from Rohini Singh and The Wire.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Statement by Piramal Group<\/strong><\/p>\n

“We are disappointed in the quality of the reportage in the factually inaccurate and libelous story written by your correspondent Ms. Rohini Singh dated April 28, 2018. The Piramal Group strongly refutes the false allegations made by The Wire and in the interest of our stakeholders, would like to provide the following facts:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Piramal Estates Private Limited (\u201cPEPL\u201d) purchased Flashnet Info Solutions Private Limited (\u201cFlashnet\u201d), a firm owned by Mr. Piyush Goyal and Ms. Seema Goyal, in July 2014. The purchase consideration paid was the fair value of the underlying investments (movable and immovable assets) and the same was paid in July 2014 itself. This was based on an independent chartered accountant valuation.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Piramal Group has a long track record of acquiring businesses that complement, scale up or grow our existing business offerings and also constantly evaluates any new opportunities to grow in new space.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

One of the primary businesses of the Piramal Group is financial services, under which the Piramal Group ONLY provides loans to various entities across various sectors (including power and renewal energy) in the normal course of its business.\u00a0 Piramal Group has tied up with APG to co-lend with Piramal Group to borrowers in the Infrastructure sector. The current nature of business of Piramal Group does not involve any direct or indirect interaction with the Ministry of Power or any of its agencies since the Piramal Group is purely in the business of lending to companies (including to those in infrastructure). Further, Piramal Group has not invested in any entity in the power sector till date. Therefore, purchase of Flashnet from Mr. Piyush Goyal by PEPL does not IN ANY WAY benefit the existing businesses of the Piramal Group.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

PEPL has complied with the applicable regulations and done the requisite filings while acquiring shares of Flashnet.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

In October 2014, as a part of the internal restructuring, the then directors of PEPL, namely Mr. Ajay Piramal, Dr. Swati Piramal, Ms. Nandini Piramal and Mr. Anand Piramal stepped down from the directorship of PEPL. However, the OWNERSHIP of PEPL CONTINUES to be with the Piramal Family.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

The allegation that this transaction was done for the undue benefit to the Piramal Group, is totally baseless and devoid of any merit. This malicious news article published by Ms. Rohini Singh is libelous and is an attack on the reputation of the Piramal Group. The Group is contemplating taking immediate and appropriate legal measures, including defamatory action, against both The Wire and Ms. Rohini Singh in particular.”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

With regards,
\nPiramal Group<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rohini Singh responds to the Piramal Group statement<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Tuesday, April 24, I sent two SMS to Ajay Piramal informing him of the fact that The Wire was doing a story on his group and asking what his email address was so that we could get his comments in the interests of fairness and objectivity.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Following my second SMS, I got a call from Dimple Kapoor, the head of corporate communications, Piramal Group, who said she had been asked by Ajay Piramal to get in touch with me.<\/p>\n

Kapoor asked me to email my questions, which she said would be answered, and SMSed me her email address, following which I emailed her a questionnaire for Ajay Piramal.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Kapoor sent an SMS asking for the email to be sent again, which I did. I then sent her two SMSs, and asked whether she would be sending me a response.<\/p>\n

When she did not reply, I sent text messages to Ajay Piramal himself in which I (1) repeated the questionnaire, (2) expressed my hope that he would respond, and (3) said we would proceed with our story but update it with his response as and when it came.<\/p>\n

In other words, our questionnaire was sent on April 24 and the story published on April 28. In the intervening four days, the Piramal Group made no attempt to clarify any point, or offer an answer to our questions.<\/p>\n

The very first question related to Piramal Estates\u2019s purchase of the shares of Piyush Goyal and Seema Goyal. The transaction date referred to in the questionnaire is \u201cSeptember 2014\u201d. The first question also sought a clarification on the price.<\/p>\n

As noted in our story, Flashnet\u2019s filings show the date of transfer of shares as September 29, 2014. Thus, not only does the record of transfer with the ROC indicate September 2014 as the date of transfer, but\u00a0The Wire\u00a0<\/em>had no reason to think the company had made a false declaration and that there was any other date. In any event, the date on which ownership of shares was transferred is incidental to the purport of the story.<\/p>\n

Our question regarding the price at which the company was bought remained un-answered. The face value of each share is Rs 10. Going by Piramal Estates\u2019s filings, Flashnet was bought for Rs 48 crore, which works out to approximately Rs.9586\/- per share. The Piramal Group now tells us that the valuation of Flashnet was fixed upon the advice of an \u201cindependent chartered accountant\u201d. Had they simply responded to our questionnaire, we would surely have carried this explanation, though we might have asked what nature of assessment raised the value of each share about 1000 times \u2013 only to end up declaring the net worth of the company by March 2015 to be less than a quarter of that valuation.<\/p>\n

Our other questions sought to know the reasons behind the Piramal Group\u2019s decision to buy Flashnet and the nature of the relationship between Ajay Piramal and Piyush Goyal. Finally, we asked for a description from the Piramal Group of its recent forays into the renewable energy and power sectors \u2013 which have been widely covered in the media over the past few years and not contradicted by the company.<\/p>\n

The Piramal Group returned no explanation to any of these questions.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As for the Piramal Group\u2019s track record, we have no reason to comment on the same and we have not done so.<\/p>\n

The Wire responds to the Piramal group statement<\/strong><\/p>\n

The article in\u00a0The Wire<\/em>\u00a0is a factual recitation of the transaction between Piyush Goyal and his erstwhile company, Flashnet, and Piramal Estates Private Limited, based on filings made by the companies themselves. The article raises questions about the propriety of the transaction given Goyal\u2019s status as a minister and makes no allegation against the Piramal group whatsoever.<\/p>\n

The public has a right to know about the business dealings of ministers, especially if there is a potential conflict of interest, and it is the responsibility of the media to report about such matters.<\/p>\n

From April 24, 2018, every effort was made by Rohini Singh and\u00a0The Wire<\/em>\u00a0to get the Piramal Group to provide its account and explanation of the transaction in question before the article was published. Unfortunately, the company chose not to respond.<\/p>\n

As it has finally responded, we have now carried Piramal\u2019s version in full, as we had said earlier.<\/p>\n

Courtesy:\u00a0The Wire<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

https:\/\/thewire.in\/political-economy\/in-selling-firm-to-piramal-group-as-minister-piyush-goyal-pushes-ethical-boundaries<\/p>\n

https:\/\/thewire.in\/political-economy\/piramal-group-responds-to-the-wires-story-on-piyush-goyal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From Flashnet to Shirdi, Railway Minister Piyush Goyal hides details of key business dealings The…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"koo_publish_custom_meta":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-main-story"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=761"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/761\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":765,"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/761\/revisions\/765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/railsamachar.com\/english\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}